The young sons of women who had high concentrations of two common phthalates when pregnant, don’t show the kind of play behavior we normally associate with boys.
A University of Rochester Medical Center study of 145 preschool children shows that where pregnant women have high concentrations of two common phthalates in their urine their young sons play in a less traditionally male way. Phthalates are chemicals used to soften plastics and are commonly found in the environment. People may be exposed to them in foods, soaps and lotions. Scientists believe that exposure to phthalates lowers testosterone levels. Testosterone is a male hormone and is very important for male brain development. Scientists already know that low testosterone levels affect male genital development and that exposure to phthalates may cause this. They are worried that prenatal exposure to phthalates, will also affect male brain development. They are concerned that this will result in changed male behavior.
In the Rochester study, Dr. Shana Swan, an expert in reproductive health and phthalates, made this hypothesis: If pregnant women have high phthalate levels when their fetus’s male genitals start functioning, their sons’ brain development will be altered and this will affect their play.
From 2000 to 2003 urine samples were taken from women at week 28 of their pregnancies. The samples were tested for two phthalates DEHP and DBP. When the children of these women were between 3 and 6 years old the women answered a questionnaire called the Preschool Activities Inventory. The questionnaire asked about what toys and activities the sons enjoyed. For example, trucks and play fighting rather than dolls and gentler activities. The scientists also asked the parents whether they would encourage or discourage the more feminine play.
The study found that there was a direct relationship between elevated phthalate levels and less “traditional” male play in their young sons. (There was no relationship between phthalate levels in the pregnant women and their daughters’ play behavior).
Questions to Consider:
-What are your reactions to this text?
-Do you think it is true that Phthalate exposure can lead to less-masculine play by boys?
-If so, would you try to prevent pregnant mothers and boys from being exposed to Phthalate?
-What would you do if you had a boy who preferred toys that girls usually play with (e.g. dolls),
or a girl who preferred toys that boys usually play with (e.g. trucks)? (encourage or discourage)
--Does the text agree or disagree with this statement: “phthalate exposure can lead to later sexual development in male organisms.”
---What information would you need to find out, or what experiments would you perform?
Acknowledgments:
Articles on this topic:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091116085040.htm
http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/news/story/index.cfm?id=2689
Information on Phthalates:
http://www.ewg.org/chemindex/term/480
Picture:
http://www.clker.com/clipart-9370.html
Arianne and Lily- Section 2
Phthalate Exposure- Less Masculine Play in Boys
This is really interesting but many children like more masculine or feminine toys at a young age. I don't think I would do much about it because it is not harmful and the children could grow out of it.
ReplyDeleteResponding to question 3 I would not prevent mothers from phthalates unless it was dangerous to the mother and son's health.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting article, but I was a bit confused on some of it. It was very well presented but a little bit of it was not very clear.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Irena. I think it is fine if young boys play with feminine toys as long as they eventually grow out of it.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting topic, and to add on to Dana's responds, I wouldn't agree with preventing Phthalates as long as they cause no harm.
ReplyDeleteI think that this article does not have enough evidence that phthalate's directly cause feminine play, it could just be a contributing factor.
ReplyDeleteGood article. It will be interesting to see how this study is taken in different areas in the U.S and the world, based on culture in that area
ReplyDeletegood article, but you could have added more examples and more evidence
ReplyDeleteGood article, but I felt it was a bit confusing, and there could be more evidence. I think the idea is a little bit strange though.
ReplyDeletehow do they know that the behavior changes are not just their personality, many characteristicas are learned behaviors so the femininism could have been because the children are close to female figures in their lives such as their mothers. Also, why is it only boys that are effected?
ReplyDeleteGood article, but I think the idea of toys making boys less masculine in a little weird.
ReplyDeleteGood article, but what i am confused about is how there is enough supporting evidence for the experiment.
ReplyDeleteInteresting topic. Although your presentation was informative and clear, the blog article could have included more information on phthalates. I would also be interested to learn the scientists' opinions on the results of this experiment.
ReplyDeleteCool topic. But I'm interested in learning the other possible causes for this masculine play then we could compare them. Also, why does this only happen to boys.
ReplyDeleteYeah, do phthalates make girls play with masculin toys?
ReplyDeleteto me, this study is subconsciously trying to find an answer for homosexuality. but, it's not a disease, nor is it a problem, so i'm slightly offended.
ReplyDeleteI think this is an interesting topic. However, I do think that this idea is a bit farfetched. To deduce whether a boy will play with toys quantitively, through testing for levels of plastic while they are newborns, is a bit ridiculous. To abanx, I disagree. I doubt that doctors can predetermine a newborn to be homosexual. ever.
ReplyDeletefrom Konstantine 2010.
@abanx, I'm not too sure about that. True, 145 children isn't the biggest subject size, but it is large enough to see that phthalates do have some effect on the prenatal male brain. I think it would some sort of statistical anomaly if all 145 children whose mothers happened to have high phthalate leves were homosexual.
ReplyDelete-In the original article it says that the mothers' phthalate exposure when pregnant does not affect the daughters. (without an explanation)
ReplyDelete-The idea that "toys are making boys less masculine is wrong," it should be that the mothers' exposure to phthalates may affect their sons' prenatal brains and may cause less "masculine" play (trucks, play fighting), and/or later development.
-@abanx- I do not think that the idea of trying to find an answer for homosexuality even crossed the scientists mind. I believe that they were only trying to find some affects of phthalate exposure in pregnant mothers.
-I hope this clears some things up.
This is a really cool topic but I agree with the people that said there needs to be more supporting evidence. I also agree with Clay in that it would be really cool to see what would happen you you expanded the horizons of this experiment in different parts of the world.
ReplyDeleteThats interesting i did a blog about how phthalates cuase ADHD, so maybe we should just stop using these if its doing all this harm to the worlds youth
ReplyDeleteI really think this is interesting. Along with toys making kids more masculine, I think it would be interesting to see the effects of violent TV making kids more aggressive or different societal effects changing how children act.
ReplyDelete-nate c
I wonder what other things this chemical is in?
ReplyDelete-nate c
how do u pronounce phthalate?
ReplyDeleteThis is really interesting and i have heard more about what phalates do so i think maybe people should stop using phthalates as much
ReplyDeleteGood, article but I agree with James you should've used more evidence to prove your case
ReplyDeleteThis was a very interesting article that was well written, but a bit unclear at times. I agree with Clay, I think it's interesting that this is a large issue in the U.S., and could it be because of our culture?
ReplyDeleteI think that this topic is very interesting. I never thought that was the truth but maybe.
ReplyDeleteGood Job!
Good job, i never thought that playing with toys makes boy less manly...
ReplyDeletevery well presented and organized, but I would be intrested to know in what conditions a boy might be exposed to a plastic softner.
ReplyDeleteI believe that if there is not any information saying that it may harm the child, then we should not worry about the material. I think that many more tests will have to be done in order to determine if this is a legitimate reason to ban toys with phthalates
ReplyDeleteI believe "phthalate" is pronounced "thal-ate."
ReplyDeleteThe study was only conducted with 145 children, additionally there are tons of variables here that seem like the could not all be accounted for. I would look to see more conclusive results before I moved to ban these substances which are so common in toys.
ReplyDelete