Thursday, December 10, 2009

Phthalate Exposure- Less Masculine Play in Boys



The young sons of women who had high concentrations of two common phthalates when pregnant, don’t show the kind of play behavior we normally associate with boys.

A University of Rochester Medical Center study of 145 preschool children shows that where pregnant women have high concentrations of two common phthalates in their urine their young sons play in a less traditionally male way. Phthalates are chemicals used to soften plastics and are commonly found in the environment. People may be exposed to them in foods, soaps and lotions. Scientists believe that exposure to phthalates lowers testosterone levels. Testosterone is a male hormone and is very important for male brain development. Scientists already know that low testosterone levels affect male genital development and that exposure to phthalates may cause this. They are worried that prenatal exposure to phthalates, will also affect male brain development. They are concerned that this will result in changed male behavior.



Boy Playing With Toy Truck Clip Art


In the Rochester study, Dr. Shana Swan, an expert in reproductive health and phthalates, made this hypothesis: If pregnant women have high phthalate levels when their fetus’s male genitals start functioning, their sons’ brain development will be altered and this will affect their play.

From 2000 to 2003 urine samples were taken from women at week 28 of their pregnancies. The samples were tested for two phthalates DEHP and DBP. When the children of these women were between 3 and 6 years old the women answered a questionnaire called the Preschool Activities Inventory. The questionnaire asked about what toys and activities the sons enjoyed. For example, trucks and play fighting rather than dolls and gentler activities. The scientists also asked the parents whether they would encourage or discourage the more feminine play.

The study found that there was a direct relationship between elevated phthalate levels and less “traditional” male play in their young sons. (There was no relationship between phthalate levels in the pregnant women and their daughters’ play behavior).





Questions to Consider:

-What are your reactions to this text?

-Do you think it is true that Phthalate exposure can lead to less-masculine play by boys?

-If so, would you try to prevent pregnant mothers and boys from being exposed to Phthalate?

-What would you do if you had a boy who preferred toys that girls usually play with (e.g. dolls),
or a girl who preferred toys that boys usually play with (e.g. trucks)? (encourage or discourage)

--Does the text agree or disagree with this statement: “phthalate exposure can lead to later sexual development in male organisms.”
---What information would you need to find out, or what experiments would you perform?



Acknowledgments:

Articles on this topic:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091116085040.htm

http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/news/story/index.cfm?id=2689

Information on Phthalates:

http://www.ewg.org/chemindex/term/480

Picture:

http://www.clker.com/clipart-9370.html

Arianne and Lily- Section 2



Phthalate Exposure- Less Masculine Play in Boys

33 comments:

  1. This is really interesting but many children like more masculine or feminine toys at a young age. I don't think I would do much about it because it is not harmful and the children could grow out of it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Responding to question 3 I would not prevent mothers from phthalates unless it was dangerous to the mother and son's health.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very interesting article, but I was a bit confused on some of it. It was very well presented but a little bit of it was not very clear.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with Irena. I think it is fine if young boys play with feminine toys as long as they eventually grow out of it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Very interesting topic, and to add on to Dana's responds, I wouldn't agree with preventing Phthalates as long as they cause no harm.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think that this article does not have enough evidence that phthalate's directly cause feminine play, it could just be a contributing factor.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Good article. It will be interesting to see how this study is taken in different areas in the U.S and the world, based on culture in that area

    ReplyDelete
  8. good article, but you could have added more examples and more evidence

    ReplyDelete
  9. Good article, but I felt it was a bit confusing, and there could be more evidence. I think the idea is a little bit strange though.

    ReplyDelete
  10. how do they know that the behavior changes are not just their personality, many characteristicas are learned behaviors so the femininism could have been because the children are close to female figures in their lives such as their mothers. Also, why is it only boys that are effected?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Good article, but I think the idea of toys making boys less masculine in a little weird.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Good article, but what i am confused about is how there is enough supporting evidence for the experiment.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Interesting topic. Although your presentation was informative and clear, the blog article could have included more information on phthalates. I would also be interested to learn the scientists' opinions on the results of this experiment.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Cool topic. But I'm interested in learning the other possible causes for this masculine play then we could compare them. Also, why does this only happen to boys.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yeah, do phthalates make girls play with masculin toys?

    ReplyDelete
  16. to me, this study is subconsciously trying to find an answer for homosexuality. but, it's not a disease, nor is it a problem, so i'm slightly offended.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I think this is an interesting topic. However, I do think that this idea is a bit farfetched. To deduce whether a boy will play with toys quantitively, through testing for levels of plastic while they are newborns, is a bit ridiculous. To abanx, I disagree. I doubt that doctors can predetermine a newborn to be homosexual. ever.

    from Konstantine 2010.

    ReplyDelete
  18. @abanx, I'm not too sure about that. True, 145 children isn't the biggest subject size, but it is large enough to see that phthalates do have some effect on the prenatal male brain. I think it would some sort of statistical anomaly if all 145 children whose mothers happened to have high phthalate leves were homosexual.

    ReplyDelete
  19. -In the original article it says that the mothers' phthalate exposure when pregnant does not affect the daughters. (without an explanation)
    -The idea that "toys are making boys less masculine is wrong," it should be that the mothers' exposure to phthalates may affect their sons' prenatal brains and may cause less "masculine" play (trucks, play fighting), and/or later development.
    -@abanx- I do not think that the idea of trying to find an answer for homosexuality even crossed the scientists mind. I believe that they were only trying to find some affects of phthalate exposure in pregnant mothers.

    -I hope this clears some things up.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This is a really cool topic but I agree with the people that said there needs to be more supporting evidence. I also agree with Clay in that it would be really cool to see what would happen you you expanded the horizons of this experiment in different parts of the world.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thats interesting i did a blog about how phthalates cuase ADHD, so maybe we should just stop using these if its doing all this harm to the worlds youth

    ReplyDelete
  22. I really think this is interesting. Along with toys making kids more masculine, I think it would be interesting to see the effects of violent TV making kids more aggressive or different societal effects changing how children act.

    -nate c

    ReplyDelete
  23. I wonder what other things this chemical is in?

    -nate c

    ReplyDelete
  24. how do u pronounce phthalate?

    ReplyDelete
  25. This is really interesting and i have heard more about what phalates do so i think maybe people should stop using phthalates as much

    ReplyDelete
  26. Good, article but I agree with James you should've used more evidence to prove your case

    ReplyDelete
  27. This was a very interesting article that was well written, but a bit unclear at times. I agree with Clay, I think it's interesting that this is a large issue in the U.S., and could it be because of our culture?

    ReplyDelete
  28. I think that this topic is very interesting. I never thought that was the truth but maybe.
    Good Job!

    ReplyDelete
  29. Good job, i never thought that playing with toys makes boy less manly...

    ReplyDelete
  30. very well presented and organized, but I would be intrested to know in what conditions a boy might be exposed to a plastic softner.

    ReplyDelete
  31. I believe that if there is not any information saying that it may harm the child, then we should not worry about the material. I think that many more tests will have to be done in order to determine if this is a legitimate reason to ban toys with phthalates

    ReplyDelete
  32. I believe "phthalate" is pronounced "thal-ate."

    ReplyDelete
  33. The study was only conducted with 145 children, additionally there are tons of variables here that seem like the could not all be accounted for. I would look to see more conclusive results before I moved to ban these substances which are so common in toys.

    ReplyDelete